- From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:10:27 -0700
- To: "'xmlschema-dev@w3.org'" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2004 19:13:59 UTC
> -----Original Message----- > From: Biron,Paul V > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 4:05 PM > To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org > Subject: redefine, xs:group and UPA > > xsv v2.7 and xerces v2.6.2 disagree on the legality of the > attached schema documents. xerces thinks they are alright > but xsv thinks there is a UPA violation (because of the > wildcard in group.xsd). > > I believe that xsv is correct but would like other opinions. > xerces complains if the wildcard appears "inlined" but not > when it occurs because of a group reference...which is where > I think it's bug is. Can anyone confirm this? never mind...pilot error. Both processors report group.xsd as ambiguous on its own and both report redefine.xsd as just fine...when I was testing against xsv I incorrectly used group.xsd instead of redefine.xsd. Sorry for the waste of bandwidth. pvb
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2004 19:13:59 UTC