- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:51:18 +0100
- To: "Michael Kay" <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Michael Kay" <mhk@mhk.me.uk> writes: >> > Am I right in thinking that if a non-empty fixed value is defined >> > for an element with element-only content, then (a) the schema is >> > valid >> >> No -- this is ruled out in clause 2 of Schema Component Constraint: >> Element Declaration Properties Correct, which, via Schema Component >> Constraint: Element Default Valid (Immediate) requires simple or >> emptiable mixed content for the type of the element. > > It would be helpful if SCC Element Default Valid (Immediate) made it clear > that it applies to the fixed value as well as the default value. Yes, this could certainly be worded more clearly -- either the word 'default' should be removed from Schema Component Constraint: Element Default Valid (Immediate), or *valid* should be changed to *valid as a default value* in its invocation in clause 2 of Schema Component Constraint: Element Declaration Properties Correct. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2004 10:52:42 UTC