- From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:17:32 -0800
- To: tmoog <tmoog@sarvega.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
- Message-Id: <8904C60CACA7D51191BC00805FEAAF4301B8BF91@crdc-exch-7.crdc.kp.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: tmoog [mailto:tmoog@sarvega.com] > Sent: Mon, Nov 17, 2003 06:05 > To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org > > a. Schema Part 2, Appendix F, production [10] is a > definition of "normal character". This appears to disagree > with the definition of "normal character" > and "meta-character" in the text immediately preceding in > that it omits left and right curly braces. I don't see any > correction of this in the errata. Have I missed something ? this is a known problem and I thought there was already an erratum on this...but I see that the proposed errata text has never been approved by the WG...we'll get to it soon. > b. Suppose a malformed XmlCharRef appears in a charRange > (e.g. &-#-1-2-x-semicolon instead of &-#-1-2-3-semicolon). > Since neither "&" (nor "#" nor ";") are meta-characters, this > seems to imply that the sequence should be interpreted as six > ordinary XmlChar instead of causing an error ("Malformed > XmlCharRef in regular expression at line ..."). > Is this interpretation correct ? No, that interp is not correct. The reason is that: <x>x;</x> is not well-formed. pvb
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2003 12:31:52 UTC