- From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:17:32 -0800
- To: tmoog <tmoog@sarvega.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
- Message-Id: <8904C60CACA7D51191BC00805FEAAF4301B8BF91@crdc-exch-7.crdc.kp.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tmoog [mailto:tmoog@sarvega.com]
> Sent: Mon, Nov 17, 2003 06:05
> To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
>
> a. Schema Part 2, Appendix F, production [10] is a
> definition of "normal character". This appears to disagree
> with the definition of "normal character"
> and "meta-character" in the text immediately preceding in
> that it omits left and right curly braces. I don't see any
> correction of this in the errata. Have I missed something ?
this is a known problem and I thought there was already an erratum on this...but I see that the proposed errata text has never been approved by the WG...we'll get to it soon.
> b. Suppose a malformed XmlCharRef appears in a charRange
> (e.g. &-#-1-2-x-semicolon instead of &-#-1-2-3-semicolon).
> Since neither "&" (nor "#" nor ";") are meta-characters, this
> seems to imply that the sequence should be interpreted as six
> ordinary XmlChar instead of causing an error ("Malformed
> XmlCharRef in regular expression at line ...").
> Is this interpretation correct ?
No, that interp is not correct. The reason is that:
<x>x;</x>
is not well-formed.
pvb
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2003 12:31:52 UTC