- From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@bononia.it>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 13:37:50 +0200
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 12:07:27PM +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> Clause 2.1 of Schema Component Constraint: Derivation Valid
> (Restriction, Simple) [1] says:
Ok, thanks.
Now, regarding {base type definition} property of simple types with
variety "Atomic": if I understood correctly it can be a Primitive
Built-In datatype or a simple type derived by restriction from one of
them and so on, right?
Then the table "Schema Component Constraint: applicable facets" is not
entirely correct. The first column shouldn't be "base type definition"
in the "{variety} is atomic" case, but something like "primitive
built-in datatype which is the root of the derivation chain".
Am I missing something?
TIA,
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/
" I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant! " -- G.Romney
Received on Monday, 23 June 2003 07:37:59 UTC