W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Differentiate between unprefixed local element and global unprefixed element

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 17 Jun 2003 16:35:52 +0100
To: "Neil Bradley" <Neil.Bradley@rubus.com>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5badcgaf8n.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

"Neil Bradley" <Neil.Bradley@rubus.com> writes:

> This answer to my question below appears to rule-out the possibility
> that <unprefixed> could be defined as a local element child of the
> <fragment> element that is required to not include the prefix.

That's correct -- that element has a qualified name, courtesy of the
default namespace declaration, before the Schema processor ever gets
near it.

> > <doc xmlns="DOC_NAMESPACE">
> >   <X:fragment xmlns:X="FRAGMENT_NAMESPACE">
> >     <unprefixed>???</unprefixed>
> >   </X:fragment>
> > </doc>

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 11:35:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:15:11 UTC