- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 17 Jun 2003 16:35:52 +0100
- To: "Neil Bradley" <Neil.Bradley@rubus.com>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Neil Bradley" <Neil.Bradley@rubus.com> writes:
> This answer to my question below appears to rule-out the possibility
> that <unprefixed> could be defined as a local element child of the
> <fragment> element that is required to not include the prefix.
That's correct -- that element has a qualified name, courtesy of the
default namespace declaration, before the Schema processor ever gets
near it.
> > <doc xmlns="DOC_NAMESPACE">
> > <X:fragment xmlns:X="FRAGMENT_NAMESPACE">
> > <unprefixed>???</unprefixed>
> > </X:fragment>
> > </doc>
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 11:35:55 UTC