- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 11 Jun 2003 10:50:56 +0100
- To: hans meier <hansmeier000@yahoo.de>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
hans meier <hansmeier000@yahoo.de> writes: > Hello, > I came across the following thread on the derivation of mixed > content models. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2001Oct/0113.html > If I am not misinterpreting Henry´s answer, the follwing combinations > are allowed > > Derivation by extension > ----------------------- > base type derived type > mixed="true" mixed="true" > mixed="false" mixed="false" > > Derivation by restriction > ------------------------- > base type derived type > mixed="true" mixed="true" > mixed"false" mixed="false" > mixed="true" mixed="false" if all element content is optional > > so it should be an error, if there is mixed="false" in > the base type and mixed="true" in the restricted type. > > So why do XSV 2.4 and MSXML 4.0 SP2 say, that the following is valid? XSV failed to check that case, will be fixed in next release, sorry. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:50:59 UTC