- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 16 Jan 2003 09:37:34 +0000
- To: "Horti, Andras" <andras.horti@joanneum.at>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
"Horti, Andras" <andras.horti@joanneum.at> writes: > I was looking for the alternative of DTD type: > <!ENTITY % GeneralType "ANY"> > > for XML-Schema. I made the following type: > > <xs:complexType name="GeneralType" mixed="true"> > <xs:complexContent> > <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType"/> > </xs:complexContent> > </xs:complexType> > > Is it really an alternative or do I miss something ? That produces something which requires empty content and allows no attributes. Why not just use xs:anyType itself? If you need a private name, use vacuous extension instead of restriction. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2003 04:37:32 UTC