- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:05:32 +0100
- To: "Michael Marchegay" <mmarcheg@optonline.net>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Michael Marchegay" <mmarcheg@optonline.net> writes:
<snip/>
> I deduce from it that a simple type definition can contain several
> enumeration components in its {facets} property, and that the facets of the
> enumeration component of the base type is added to the {facets} of the
> derived type regardless of the presence of an enumeration component (built
> from "local" <enumeration> information items, as described in 4.3.5.3).
>
> I understand the last part of the last sentence as allowing multiple
> enumeration *components*. But it seems that in fact, it says that multiple
> <enumeration> information items are allowed; those will be used for building
> *one* enumeration component, that behaves just like other facet components
> (it is overriden by the one defined locally within a restriction step).
Yeah, the two parts of the REC are in conflict here. I'll raise an
official issue.
The intended semantics are clear (it should be a restriction, after
all), but the prose gets pretty confused.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2003 10:11:43 UTC