- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:05:32 +0100
- To: "Michael Marchegay" <mmarcheg@optonline.net>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Michael Marchegay" <mmarcheg@optonline.net> writes: <snip/> > I deduce from it that a simple type definition can contain several > enumeration components in its {facets} property, and that the facets of the > enumeration component of the base type is added to the {facets} of the > derived type regardless of the presence of an enumeration component (built > from "local" <enumeration> information items, as described in 4.3.5.3). > > I understand the last part of the last sentence as allowing multiple > enumeration *components*. But it seems that in fact, it says that multiple > <enumeration> information items are allowed; those will be used for building > *one* enumeration component, that behaves just like other facet components > (it is overriden by the one defined locally within a restriction step). Yeah, the two parts of the REC are in conflict here. I'll raise an official issue. The intended semantics are clear (it should be a restriction, after all), but the prose gets pretty confused. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2003 10:11:43 UTC