- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 23 Apr 2003 09:54:13 +0100
- To: Navid <silencer2020@yahoo.ca>
- Cc: XML-DEV <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, XML-SCHEMA-DEV <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Navid <silencer2020@yahoo.ca> writes:
> > Just that the XML representation of a component, in
> > this case an
> > attribute declaration, is not the cmoponent itself.
> > In this case the
> > mapping rules say that such a representation
> > corresponds to an
> > attribute declaration with {type definition} set to
> > xs:anySimpleType.
> > So the component _does_ have a type definition, and
> > it will get used
> > at validation time, and so Xerces and XSV are
> > correct.
>
> Hi Henry,
>
> Thanks for your reply. Can you give me an example of
> how clause (2) of 'Attribute Locally Valid (§3.2.4)'
> can fail?
If it's allowed by an attribute wildcard with {process contents} *lax*.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 04:54:16 UTC