W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > April 2003

RE: inconsistent union of patterns

From: Will Crosbie <Will.Crosbie@arch.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:34:03 -0500
Message-ID: <8F2B5241C41F7D469A3F8617D67A897020C765@msrl3ex1.us.arch.com>
To: "Anli Shundi" <ashundi@tibco.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>

Thank you very much for your help!  I am truly appreciative!

Will Crosbie
Quality Assurance Analyst

-----Original Message-----
From: Anli Shundi [mailto:ashundi@tibco.com]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Will Crosbie; xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Subject: RE: inconsistent union of patterns

Well you have the top-levels two-letters for all the countries

Then a few more such as .aero, .edu, .mil, to .pro at

Anli Shundi 
TIBCO Software Inc.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Will Crosbie [mailto:Will.Crosbie@arch.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 10:36 AM
> To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject: Re: inconsistent union of patterns
> Hi.  I was reading over the conversation thread and have come 
> across what I consider to be a related byproduct of the 
> conversation that you are having here.  I am trying to find 
> documentation that identifies valid extensions on an email address.
> Of course, there is no denying that .com/org/net and many 
> other three character extensions are valid email extensions.  
> But are there any valid one or two character extensions in 
> existence?  More importantly, is there any documentation on 
> the web that you are aware of that might support any 
> conclusion that you have?
> I'm hoping that I'm coming to the right set of brains on 
> this.  If possible, please reply via email to 
> will.crosbie@arch.com with any information that you might 
> have.  And thank you ever so kindly for your time.
> Will Crosbie
> Quality Assurance Analyst
> will.crosbie@arch.com
Received on Friday, 18 April 2003 12:34:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:15:10 UTC