- From: Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@frictionless.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 15:17:59 -0400
- To: "'noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com'" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: Ryan.Barr@ejgallo.com, xmlschema-dev@w3.org, "Michael Rowell (E-mail)" <mrowell@openapplications.org>
Hmmm. Multiple schemaLocations for a given import are treated as hints. But are separate schemaLocations in separate imports for the same namespace also intended to be treated as hints? As a practical matter, large namespaces are much more managable when defined across several, separate files, especially when users of the definitions from the namespace need only subsets of the definitions. OAGIS 8 has followed this model in implementing its approach to constructing overlays, building overlyay BODs (business object documents) by importing only the sets of definitions that are needed, using separate import statements for each needed set of definitions. This works fine using all available parsers. I certainly hope that developers of these parsers do not decide to start treating subsequent import statements as merely being hints. Then we'd have to build a whole bunch of adaptors in a big hurry! Mark -----Original Message----- From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 9:41 AM To: Jeni Tennison Cc: Ryan.Barr@ejgallo.com; xmlschema-dev@w3.org Subject: Re: Question about xs:import Actually, I think Jeni's answer is right in practice, but not in theory (and that's rare, she's usually right all around.) schemaLocations are hints. So if you have two for a given namespace in the instance, your schema processor is free to follow one, the other, both, or neither. In practice, most processors would follow at most the first. Furthermore, it would be illegal to have conflicting definitions or declarations, so unless you'd carefully written the two documents to be imported together, it's unlikely that processing would proceed without error as the second one was brought in. I don't believe it's strictly an error to put together schemas for the same namespace from multiple documents, but any uses I can imagine would be highly specialized and would be unlikely to be implemented in the sort of "off the shelf" validators that most of us are using. Thanks very much. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2002 15:18:34 UTC