- From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:00:37 +0200
- To: "Stefan Wachter" <Stefan.Wachter@gmx.de>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> About adding behaviour: JBind does not intend to define the behaviour of XML > data inside an XML schema. It mearly allows to add behaviour by the seamless > intergration of manually written Java code with the generated code. I was referring to the xPathMethod feature, which I interpreted as an attempt to define behavior inside the schema. On the other hand this feature could be seen as an instrument for specifying derived values and constraints, which I agree is a very good thing to have (and will hopefully on day be part of the schema standard). > About unmarshalling large documents that do not fit into memory: Thats not > possible with JBind the reason is that the complete object tree is > instantiated (Maybe you asked that question because the usage of > unconstraint XPath in identity constraints on types?). That would certainly be a killer feature for us, though certainly not simple to implement. In fact, no data binding tools I am aware of work with large files, but I haven't done an extensive review. > About the license: I submitted the JBind license to opensoftware.org for > approval. The license is a mixture of two already approved licenses: the > Artistic License and the Attribution Assurance License. I see, I remember some discussion on how free software was not necessarily like free beer, but IANAL :-) -- Eric Jain
Received on Friday, 13 September 2002 10:00:44 UTC