- From: Siarhei Biarozkin <sberyozkin@zandar.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:23:42 +0100
- To: "Eddie Robertsson" <erobertsson@allette.com.au>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: "XSD" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Hello, this question is probably unrelated to the original post, I'd like to constrain a complex type's content in such a way that it can only allow elements of any simple type (built-in or user-defined), so that their tags could be different : <xs:complexType name="PropertiesType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:anySimpleType minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> But xs:anySimpleType can not be used, so I'll have to use xs:any instead and use some custom validation on top of it, Is there another way for achieving such a constraint ? Thanks Sergey Beryozkin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> To: "Eddie Robertsson" <erobertsson@allette.com.au> Cc: "XSD" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 9:19 AM Subject: Re: xs:anySimpleType in sFs > > This issue is logged in the issues list [1]. If you look there you > will find the following resolution: > > "Discussed at the May 23 telecon: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002May/0091.html > Henry Thompson to draft erratum: > > * Clarifying that the schema for schemas can derive primitives > from anySimpleType, although users cannot. > * Making the constraint normative, as per Jeni Tennison's point." > > I should get to this in the next week or 10 days -- there are a lot of > errata drafting tasks on my stack. . . > > ht > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-rec-comments#pfiS4SanySimpleType > -- > Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh > W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team > 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ > [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] > > >
Received on Friday, 13 September 2002 05:24:09 UTC