- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 06:58:11 -0500 (EST)
- To: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
- Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org, xmlschema-dev@w3.org, www-forms@w3.org
AndrewWatt2000@aol.com scripsit: > So, <xsd:pattern value="\w" /> would match many (unwanted) characters that < > xsd:pattern value="[A-Za-z0-9_] /> would reject as non-matching. Correct? Definitely. > In W3C XML Schema, and therefore in XForms, is it correct that the only way > to express the notion of an English language / ASCII "word character" in a > regular expression is using [A-Za-z0-9_]? Correct. > Is there any facility to express the notion of, for example, a French word > character? Or German? You'd have to concoct a similar character class, and there is always a measure of controversy about these things. The standard English spellings of "naïve" and "façade" require letters outside [A-Za-z], and so does one spelling of "coöperate". > Or is the \p{Basic_Latin} the smallest / most precise > "chunk" of characters that can be used in such a setting? That certainly doesn't do what you want: it matches any ASCII character, rejecting the non-ASCII ones. -- We call nothing profound jcowan@reutershealth.com that is not wittily expressed. John Cowan --Northrop Frye (improved) http://www.reutershealth.com
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 07:00:17 UTC