RE: A complex type cannot be a restriction of a simpleType ??

I reported this to Altova at least six months ago.  
Hasn't it been corrected in XML Spy 5?  (I'm still using 4.4).  

_____
[This mail represents part of a discussion of work in progress 
and should not be used for any purpose without my permission.] 
_____
Simon.Cox@csiro.au  CSIRO Exploration & Mining
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151
PO Box 1130, Bentley WA 6102  AUSTRALIA
T: +61 (8) 6436 8639  F: +61 (8) 6436 8555  C: +61 (4) 0330 2672
http://www.csiro.au/page.asp?type=resume&id=CoxSimon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Feblowitz [mailto:mfeblowitz@frictionless.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 October 2002 1:22 AM
> To: 'ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk'
> Cc: Ted Toth; xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject: RE: A complex type cannot be a restriction of a simpleType ??
> 
> 
> 
> It certainly looks that way. I wonder why there's confusion.
> 
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk] 
> Sent:	Monday, October 07, 2002 1:12 PM
> To:	Mark Feblowitz
> Cc:	Ted Toth; xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject:	Re: A complex type cannot be a restriction of a 
> simpleType
> ??
> 
> Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@frictionless.com> writes:
> 
> > If that's the case, then the XML Spy folks need to be 
> contacted, too.
> While
> > Spy does validate the schema in "Schema View" mode, in text 
> view mode it
> > gives the following error:
> > 
> > Schema error - undefined schema component "base" encountered -
> simpleContent
> > can not have a base that is a complexType with complexContent.
> 
> But this is wrong -- element is a complexType with _simple_ content,
> right?
> 
> ht
> -- 
>   Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, 
> University of Edinburgh
>           W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
>      2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 
> 131 650-4440
> 	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
> 		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
>  [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without 
> it is forged
> spam]
> Confidentiality Notice: This message, including any 
> attachments, is intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed 
> and may contain
> information that is privileged and confidential.  If you have 
> received this
> email in error, please delete it.  Any disclosure, copying or 
> distribution
> of this message is strictly prohibited.  Thank you.
>

Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2002 05:03:20 UTC