RE: A complex type cannot be a restriction of a simpleType ??

If that's the case, then the XML Spy folks need to be contacted, too. While
Spy does validate the schema in "Schema View" mode, in text view mode it
gives the following error:

Schema error - undefined schema component "base" encountered - simpleContent
can not have a base that is a complexType with complexContent.


If I change ID to have a base of xsd:string, the following error is
reported:

Schema error - undefined schema component "base" encountered - you must use
a complexType instead of "xsd:string" because a simpleContent/restriction
can't be based on a simpleType.

Is the problem that this particular combination of extension and restriction
is not allowed?


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk] 
Sent:	Monday, October 07, 2002 12:31 PM
To:	Ted Toth
Cc:	xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Subject:	Re: A complex type cannot be a restriction of a simpleType
??


The schema looks OK at a quick read-through, and if SQC likes it
that's a pretty good sign.  Sounds like you need to hit the Castor
people with a bug report.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged
spam]
Confidentiality Notice: This message, including any attachments, is intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged and confidential.  If you have received this
email in error, please delete it.  Any disclosure, copying or distribution
of this message is strictly prohibited.  Thank you.

Received on Monday, 7 October 2002 12:52:47 UTC