- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 03 Oct 2002 09:23:53 +0100
- To: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@allette.com.au>
- Cc: Steven Bird <sb@ldc.upenn.edu>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org, Gary Simons <Gary_Simons@sil.org>
Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@allette.com.au> writes:
<snip/>
> My guess would be because the spec isn't clear on this issue. If there
> is an errata out that fix this problem then validators will probably
> change accordingly.
There is indeed a contradiction, and that's been acknowledged by the
WG, and resolved in favour of allowing the derivation [1]. I'm behind
on drafting the official erratum, sorry.
ht
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-rec-comments.html#pfiSimpleContent
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2002 04:24:05 UTC