Re: Why No Abstract on SimplyType? from Henry S. Thompson on 2002-11-11 (xmlschema-dev@w3.org from November 2002)

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 11 Nov 2002 11:29:53 +0000
To: Neil Bradley <neil.bradley@rubus.com>
Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b1y5s4a4u.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Neil Bradley <neil.bradley@rubus.com> writes:

> Thanks. Are you saying that basing abstract types on concrete types had
> nothing to do with the argument, and that it is OK to do so (for complex
> types at least)?

That's correct.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

Received on Monday, 11 November 2002 06:29:55 UTC