W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > May 2002

RE: XML Schemas

From: Asir S Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 15:13:34 -0400
To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, <semorris@cisco.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OKEBJFDOCNPMPLOONLOICECNCHAA.asirv@webmethods.com>

mm .. For some reasons, I thought that we have this capability in 1.0 But,
now I am confused. Here is what I had in my mind,

<simpleType name="discreteInt">
	<union>
		<simpleType>
			<restriction base="int">
				<enumeration value="0"/>
			</restriction>
		</simpleType>
	</union>
	<union>
		<simpleType>
			<restriction base="int">
				<minInclusive value="5"/>
				<maxInclusive value="7"/>
			</restriction>
		</simpleType>
	</union>
	<union>
		<simpleType>
			<restriction base="int">
				<minInclusive value="10"/>
				<maxInclusive value="15"/>
			</restriction>
		</simpleType>
	</union>
</simpleType>

Asir


-----Original Message-----
From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org
[mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Sean Morris (by way of "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen"
<<semorris@cisco.com<semorris>); xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Subject: Re: XML Schemas




Sean Morris suggests (on the schema comments list...I've moved here so we
can discuss):

>> Add support for defining multiple ranges for integers.
>> For example an integer element can be 0, 5-7, 10-15, etc.

Sean:  there are many such capabilities that we might consider adding to
what is already a complex spec.  Each such feature is a bit more for users
to learn and understand, a bit more to model in components, and more for
which to write test cases.  So, we usually try to make the case that a new
feature is either of great use to a broad range of users, or more rarely,
of very great importance to a smaller set of users.   Do you have
implementation experience to suggest that multiple ranges meets an 80/20 or
90/10 cut?

Also:  we have to think about the rules for refinement.  Can:

      Integer [5-10, 11-15]

      be refined to

      Integer [7-12]?

Keep in mind that integer is a subtype of decimal and presumably:

      Decimal [5.0-10.0, 11.0-15.0]

      is not a refinement of

      Decimal [7.0-12.0]?  (this allows 10.5 and the base type does not?

Is the component representation of

      Integer [5-10, 11-15]

      distinct from

      Integer [5-15]?

One thing we've all learned in doing schemas is that there is rarely such a
thing as a simple, cheap, or safe feature.  Can you make the case that the
need for the feature request is sufficiently urgent that the moderate
additional complexity is justified?  Many thanks.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------






                      Sean Morris
                      <semorris@cisco.com> (by           To:       W3C XML
Schema Comments list <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
                      way of "C. M.                      cc:       (bcc:
Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
                      Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq          Subject:  XML
Schemas
                      Sent by:
                      www-xml-schema-comments-req
                      uest@w3.org



                      05/30/2002 08:38 PM










Add support for defining multiple ranges for integers.  For example an
integer element can be 0, 5-7, 10-15, etc.

Thanks,
Sean
Received on Friday, 31 May 2002 15:10:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:55:56 UTC