- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 09:59:26 -0400
- To: Margarita Isayeva <isayevam@yahoo.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
This has been considered many times, but it's a subtle business. Physicists want units (Angstroms), printers want units (picas), city planners want units (acres), and that's just for linear measurements. We have an extensible type system. For now, the hope is that domain experts will (separately or together) promote their own standards. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Margarita Isayeva <isayevam@yahoo.com> Sent by: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org 05/21/02 01:26 AM To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org cc: (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) Subject: Re: <length> = a real number plus a unit qualification Shouldn't units be a part of XML Schema? They are more fundamental facets of data than float/double artificial dichotomy. Is anyone aware of any W3C activity regarding adding units to Schema specifications? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2002 10:16:38 UTC