- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:52:31 +0100
- To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Ignoring this option: <length value="2.54">cm</length> if Noah's example makes for better markup. why not move the value into an attribute also?: <length units="cm" value="2.54" /> Bill de hÓra > -----Original Message----- > From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org > [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com > Sent: 14 May 2002 01:22 > To: Chuck Paussa > Cc: Jeni Tennison; xmlschema-dev@w3.org > Subject: Re: <length> = a real number plus a unit qualification > > > I understand that it may not meet the need, but there are > many who would > argue that: > > <length units="cm">2.54</length> > > is better markup than: > > <length> 2.54 cm</length> > > It's easier to manipulate with tools like XPath, XSL, and presumably > Query, it can be more strongly typed. etc. Of course, since > XML does not > have structured attributes, it works only for elements. > Still, it's worth > considering if it meets your needs. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 > IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 > One Rogers Street > Cambridge, MA 02142 > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2002 07:59:49 UTC