- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:52:31 +0100
- To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Ignoring this option:
<length value="2.54">cm</length>
if Noah's example makes for better markup. why not move the value into
an attribute also?:
<length units="cm" value="2.54" />
Bill de hÓra
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org
> [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
> noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
> Sent: 14 May 2002 01:22
> To: Chuck Paussa
> Cc: Jeni Tennison; xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject: Re: <length> = a real number plus a unit qualification
>
>
> I understand that it may not meet the need, but there are
> many who would
> argue that:
>
> <length units="cm">2.54</length>
>
> is better markup than:
>
> <length> 2.54 cm</length>
>
> It's easier to manipulate with tools like XPath, XSL, and presumably
> Query, it can be more strongly typed. etc. Of course, since
> XML does not
> have structured attributes, it works only for elements.
> Still, it's worth
> considering if it meets your needs.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036
> IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2002 07:59:49 UTC