Re: ctA029.xsd (test case)

Stanley Guan <stanley.guan@oracle.com> writes:

> The expected result for the following test case ctA029 should be valid:
> 
>   Declaration with optional attribute id = 'foo123' , an included object with
>   and id='foo123'
> 
> because the checking for uniqueness is within each document!  Am I right?

Without checking the docs involved, your analysis seems correct to me.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

Received on Friday, 15 March 2002 04:25:28 UTC