- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 18 Jul 2002 12:16:16 +0100
- To: Xan Gregg <xan@tibco.com>
- Cc: "'Dare Obasanjo'" <dareo@microsoft.com>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org, Brenda Bell <bbell@juicesoftware.com>
Xan Gregg <xan@tibco.com> writes:
> And to make matters worse, the soapbuilders group intentionally decided to
> use the flawed WSDL example as a model for array definitions in their
> interoperability suite. Their argument is that compatibility is more
> important than correctness.
>
> And it looks like the recent WSDL 1.2 : Bindings WD [1] propagates the
> error.
They show an issue in their issues list against the broken examples:
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x50
but it doesn't seem to be getting much attention.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 07:17:55 UTC