W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > July 2002

RE: Array Confusion

From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 10:47:44 -0700
Message-ID: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E0696F638@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@jenitennison.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>, "Brenda Bell" <bbell@juicesoftware.com>

You are not the first to note a certain lack of understanding of W3C XML
Schema on the parts of the WSDL/SOAP editors. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
The primary function of the design engineer is to make things difficult
for the fabricator and impossible for the serviceman.

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeni Tennison [mailto:jeni@jenitennison.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:38 AM
> To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org; Brenda Bell
> Subject: Re: Array Confusion
> 
> Briefly glancing through the WSDL/SOAP encoding specs, I 
> think that the authors of those specs might be missing the 
> fact that when you derive a type by restriction you must 
> specify a content model for the type, or specify that it's 
> mixed, otherwise elements of that type can't legally contain anything.
> 
> But *you* don't seem to be missing anything -- your 
> description of what the DoubleArray type definition is doing 
> is absolutely correct.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jeni
> 
> ---
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com/
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2002 13:48:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:15:04 UTC