- From: Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@frictionless.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:18:54 -0400
- To: "'Jeff Lowery'" <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Don't laugh (too hard) - We did almost that: we use Schematron as a Post-Validation-Schema-Constraint-Checker (PVSCC?). Because derivation by restriction is so - restrictive - we develop "relaxed" models (all content optional) and then layer on the minimum occurrence constraints as a separate specification (validated in a separate, post-validation check). We'd love to find a standard way to express these constraints (and the obvious and widely discussed co-occurrence constraints) in a schema, include the schema of our relaxed model to which they apply, and then have the schema-validating-constraint-checker do the rest for us. Mark -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Lowery [mailto:jlowery@scenicsoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:12 PM To: Mark Feblowitz Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org Subject: RE: What good is Restriction? Here's the solution: XSML -> XML Schema Macro Language Just tack on an XML Schema preprocessor - voila! Call the result the Pre Schema Parsing Infoset (PSPI). What? You want me to go away??
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2002 16:19:34 UTC