W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > July 2002

RE: Representing NOTATIONs in XML Schema?

From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 11:19:36 -0700
Message-ID: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621D8A@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>, <costello@mitre.org>

One of our XML Schema WG reps opined that  notations in W3C XML Schema are not the same as those from DTDs in XML 1.0 due to various incompatibilities that couldn't be resolved. 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Roger L. Costello [mailto:costello@mitre.org] 
	Sent: Tue 7/2/2002 11:05 AM 
	To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org; costello@mitre.org 
	Subject: Representing NOTATIONs in XML Schema?

	Hi Folks,
	I am trying to convert a DTD which uses NOTATIONs into an XML Schema. I
	never use NOTATIONs so I am not sure what the XML Schema should look
	[Separate question: does anyone use NOTATIONs in XML?  I thought that
	NOTATIONs was an SGML thing that had lost favor in the XML community.  I
	would be very interested in knowing the answer to this question.]
	Let's take an example.  Here's a DTD snippet which declares an element
	and a NOTATION attribute:
	<!ELEMENT CountryCode (#PCDATA)>
	<!ATTLIST CountryCode
	            vocabulary NOTATION (ISO-1 | ISO-2) "ISO-1">
	<!NOTATION ISO-1 SYSTEM "http://www.iso.org/country-codes/version1">
	<!NOTATION ISO-2 SYSTEM "http://www.iso.org/country-codes/version2">
	What would the corresponding XML Schema look like?  Here's my take on
	<xsd:element name="CountryCode">
	        <xsd:extension base="xsd:string>
	            <xsd:attribute name="vocabulary" type="ISO-1_NOTATION"/>
	            <xsd:attribute name="vocabulary" type="ISO-2_NOTATION"/>
	<xsd:simpleType name="ISO-1_NOTATION">
	    <xsd:restriction base="xsd:NOTATION">
	<xsd:simpleType name="ISO-2_NOTATION">
	    <xsd:restriction base="xsd:NOTATION">
	Some things to note:
	1. I know that this XML Schema is incorrect.  The datatypes spec says
	that the value of a NOTATION must be a QNAME.  I am not giving the
	enumeration facet a QNAME.
	2. The datatype's spec also says that it is invalid to use the NOTATION
	datatype directly.  Rather, you must use a derived type.  That's why I
	created the simpleType definitions.
	3. The bottom line is: I really don't know how to represent NOTATIONs in
	XML Schemas.  Any help would be appreciated.  /Roger
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 14:20:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:15:03 UTC