- From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:41:32 -0700
- To: "'noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com'" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, Colin Mackenzie <colin@elecmc.com>
- Cc: Rainer Becker <r.becker@Nitro-Software.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
+1 pvb > -----Original Message----- > From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [SMTP:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 10:21 AM > To: Colin Mackenzie > Cc: Rainer Becker; xmlschema-dev@w3.org > Subject: RE: limits of regular expressions > > I think this discussion is leading us down a slippery slope. The schema > recommendation is clear that no language, other than a Turing-complete > programming language, can provide all the validation one might reasonably > want for one application or another. > > Bottom line: I think that regex's represent a very reasonable 80/20 point > in the design space. They provide a quite powerful and generally useful > level of checking, without requiring that we invent a portable programming > language in which to capture additional logic. Thank you very much. >
Received on Friday, 23 August 2002 14:24:21 UTC