- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 23 Aug 2002 15:36:28 +0100
- To: John Verhaeg <jverhaeg@metamatrix.com>
- Cc: "XML Schema Mailing List (E-mail)" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
John Verhaeg <jverhaeg@metamatrix.com> writes: > Can someone tell me why the attached instance document using the attached > schemas won't validate? XML Spy is saying "This file is not valid: > Mandatory local element 'publisher' must be unqualified (i.e. outside of any > namespace), but you are using a default namespace". Exactly what it says -- you have (by default) specified that locally-declared elements (which 'publisher' is) must appear unqualified, but by using a default NS decl in your instance, you've caused it to appear qualified. Either use an explicit prefix on the document element only in your instance, or add "elementFormDefault='qualified'" to your xs:schema elements. This is a FAQ, sorry for the brief answer, there must be a longer one around somewhere . . . ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Friday, 23 August 2002 10:36:31 UTC