W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > August 2002

Re: Fwd: Re: Is this test case invalid (implicit derivation from ur-type / attribute wildcards)

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 16 Aug 2002 11:01:58 +0100
To: Stefan Wachter <Stefan.Wachter@gmx.de>
Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b1y8zp1ex.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>

Stefan Wachter <Stefan.Wachter@gmx.de> writes:

> Hi Jeni,
> in the schema for schemas the anyType type is defined using an <xs:any
> minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> and <xs:anyAttribute/> element. The
> default
> value for the process contents type of wildcards is "strict". Therefore I
> think the "strict" interpretation for the ur-type is correct, i.e. no
> unknown
> nested elements and attributes.
> --Stefan
> PS: I think that it would be "nicer" to have a "lax" ur-type but it is
> strict!

Jeni's right, there's an erratum pending in this area, and most schema 
processors seem to treat it as "lax" already.

  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Friday, 16 August 2002 06:02:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:15:04 UTC