- From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:21:11 -0800
- To: "'Jeni Tennison'" <jeni@jenitennison.com>, ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
- Cc: Gary Robertson <gazinyork@hotmail.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> <xs:all> > <xs:element ref="B" /> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element ref="C" maxOccurs="5" /> > </xs:sequence> > </xs:all> > > Or is the problem that the sequence in the above would be ignored > as "pointless" according to the current rules? Or is the problem that "sequence" is not the same as "contiguousness"? What if I wanted to enforce the set {<A/><B/><C/>, <B/><C/><A/>, </C></B><A/> <A/><C/><B/>}, but disallow <A/> occurences between <B/> and <C/>? It seems like I need a third content model group type: <all> <element name="A"/> <contiguous> <all> <element name="B"/> <element name="C"/> </all> </contiguous> </all> Later, Jeff
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 14:23:02 UTC