Re: Rationale for restricted uses of "all"

Ian Stokes-Rees <ijs@decisionsoft.com> writes:

> On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:06:24AM +0000, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> > "Dave Carlson" <dcarlson@ontogenics.com> writes:
> > 
> > > So did we conclude that XSV 1.3 is incorrect because it allows content
> > > model extensions of <all>, and that Xerces is correct?
> > 
> > Yes, XSV is broken -- it should not allow this.
> 
> Looking at the XSV web site, I see the version marked as:
> 
> XSV version: XSV 1.203.2.24/1.106.2.12 of 2001/11/09 15:45:05
> 
> This is from:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv
> 
> Is version 1.3 available somewhere else or am I missing something?

Sorry for the confusion.  Headline version numbers such as 1.3, 1.4
etc. are purely descriptive, and cached out in e.g. the name of the
installer (e.g. XSV14.EXE).  The revision numbers displayed during
validation (e.g. 1.203.2.24/1.106.2.12) are the CVS repository
revision numbers of the two major source files for the validator --
they change much more often than the headline version number.

1.4 is the current headline version.  1.203.2.24/1.106.2.12 is it's
current implementation, althought that will change later today.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 08:17:36 UTC