- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:56:16 +0100
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: Mike_Leditschke@nemmco.com.au, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Jeni Tennison wrote:
>
> The note clarifies the matter - the Container element's type
> definition in RestrictedType must be an explicit restriction of its
> type in BaseType. They're anonymous types, so there's no explicit
> restriction, so the schema component constraint isn't satisfied, so
> the schema isn't valid.
This would limit the recursion to the top level of complex type
definitions, which seems reasonable...
There is still a bug, but on xerces-j-2, then! (what's fun with hunting
bugs in schema processors is that for any example you are almost certain
to find a bug in one of the processors ;=) ... ).
Thanks for the lesson,
Eric
--
Rendez-vous à Paris pour le Forum XML.
http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 09:56:22 UTC