- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:56:16 +0100
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: Mike_Leditschke@nemmco.com.au, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Jeni Tennison wrote: > > The note clarifies the matter - the Container element's type > definition in RestrictedType must be an explicit restriction of its > type in BaseType. They're anonymous types, so there's no explicit > restriction, so the schema component constraint isn't satisfied, so > the schema isn't valid. This would limit the recursion to the top level of complex type definitions, which seems reasonable... There is still a bug, but on xerces-j-2, then! (what's fun with hunting bugs in schema processors is that for any example you are almost certain to find a bug in one of the processors ;=) ... ). Thanks for the lesson, Eric -- Rendez-vous à Paris pour le Forum XML. http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 09:56:22 UTC