- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 12 Nov 2001 09:08:41 +0000
- To: "Yan Leshinsky" <yanl@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Aung Aung" <aaung@microsoft.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>, "Ashok Malhotra" <ashokma@microsoft.com>, "Huseyin Ulger" <ulger@microsoft.com>, "David Brown (WEBDATA)" <davebrow@microsoft.com>
"Yan Leshinsky" <yanl@microsoft.com> writes:
> Wat about related case with substitution groups. Are following schemas
> valid?
>
> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
> <xs:element name="A"/>
> <xs:element name="B" substitutionGroup="A" type="xs:string"/>
> </xs:schema>
Yes
> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
> <xs:element name="A" type="xs:anyType"/>
> <xs:element name="B" substitutionGroup="A" type="xs:string"/>
> </xs:schema>
Yes.
> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
> <xs:element name="A"/>
> <xs:element name="B" substitutionGroup="A">
> <xs:complexType>
> ...
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
> </xs:schema>
Yes
> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
> <xs:element name="A" type="xs:anyType"/>
> <xs:element name="B" substitutionGroup="A">
> <xs:complexType>
> ...
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
> </xs:schema>
Yes.
The first and third are identical to the second and fourth at the
component level.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Monday, 12 November 2001 04:07:47 UTC