- From: Michael Shapiro <michael@creativescience.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 16:45:39 -0700
- To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
In http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#cos-particle-restrict (3.9.6... Particle Valid (Restriction).) there is a definition of pointlessness: 2.2 Any pointless occurrences of <sequence>, <choice> or <all> are ignored, where pointlessness is understood as follows: <sequence> One of the following must be true: 2.2.1 {particles} is empty. 2.2.2 All of the following must be true: 2.2.2.1 The particle within which this <sequence> appears has {max occurs} and {min occurs} of 1. 2.2.2.2 One of the following must be true: 2.2.2.2.1 The <sequence>'s {particles} has only one member. 2.2.2.2.2 The particle within which this <sequence> appears is itself among the {particles} of a <sequence>. Now, let's say I have the schema with the sequence of element and a choice particle, where the choice particle consists of two sequences with two elements in each: <schema> <element name="root"> <complexType> <sequence> <element name="a"/> <!-- this particle has min and max occurs of 1(nn 2.2.2.1 is true) --> <!-- this particle is also among the {particles} of a sequence --> <choice> <!-- this sequence's parent particle is itself among the {particles} of a sequence (2.2.2.2.2 is true). AND The particle within which this <sequence> appears has {max occurs} and {min occurs} of 1 (2.2.2.1 is true) Question: is this sequence "pointless"? why? --> <sequence minOccurs="0"> <element name="b"/> <element name="c"/> </sequence> <!-- this sequence's parent particle is also among the {particles} of a sequence (2.2.2.2.2 is true). (2.2.2.1 is true) Question: is this sequence "pointless"? why? --> <sequence> <element name="d"/> <element name="e"/> </sequence> </choice> </sequence> </complexType> </element> </schema> The schema should validate the following three XML documents: <root><a/></root> <root><a/><b/><c/></root> <root><a/><d/><e/></root> It should not validate the following xml: <root><a/><b/><c/><d/><e/></root> What am I missing here? Thank for <xs:any/> help, Michael
Received on Sunday, 20 May 2001 19:58:37 UTC