- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 16 May 2001 17:48:57 +0100
- To: Tinny Ng <tng-xml@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Tinny Ng <tng-xml@ca.ibm.com> writes:
> According the schema spec, we are allowed to have duplicate element
> declaration within the same scope as long as they are of the same type,
> i.e.
>
> <element name="root">
> <complexType>
> <sequence>
> <element name="A" type="string"/>
> <element name="A" type="string"/>
> </sequence>
> </complexType>
> </element>
>
> But if the second has substitutionGroup specified, i.e.
>
> <element name="root">
> <complexType>
> <sequence>
> <element name="A" type="string"/>
> <element name="A" type="string" substitutionGroup="ipo:comment"/>
> </sequence>
> </complexType>
> </element>
>
> then
>
> 1. If this valid?
No, because 'substitutionGroup' is only allowed on top-level declarations.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2001 12:48:55 UTC