RE: ASN.1 => XML Schema questions

• From: <mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp>
• Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 10:59:47 +0900 (LMT)
• To: davec@progress.com
• Cc: mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20010706105947B.mmurata@trl.ibm.com>

From: "David E. Cleary" <davec@progress.com>
Subject: RE: ASN.1 => XML Schema questions
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:20:37 -0400

> > >The "no changing the infoset" design appeals to me because
> > >it seems simpler, but I gather it doesn't meet the needs
> > >of folks that want to do XML Protocols, Java bindings,
> > >and the like.
> > 
> > No, you only have to create a layer on top of traditionals APIs.
> > Relaxer does the job by creating Java programs from descriptions in
> > RELAX.  For example, Relaxer supports default values by embedding 
> > them in Java classes.
> 
> How does this differ than the creation of a PSVI?

Neither DOM nor SAX is messed up.  XML Schema makes them heavy and 
harder to use.

Cheers,

<warning>Speaking for himself only</warning>

IBM Tokyo Research Lab / International University of Japan, Research Institute
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)

Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 22:01:06 UTC