- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 17:30:36 +0200
- To: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@definedweb.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Jeff Rafter wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > and to consider the datatype as ordered (might be useful for XPath 2.0).
>
> Good point-- does this mean that an optional Time Zone Qualifier should be
> added as well as in the current date types?
It would be nice, but I don't see how we could do it.
We wouldn't be able to keep the hack of using a decimal datatype with a
Time Zone Qualifier within the field itself and if we added it as an
attribute, we would have inconsistent results when sorting values with
different time zones.
Or have I missed something ?
Thanks
Eric
>
> Regards,
> Jeff Rafter
> Defined Systems
> http://www.defined.net
> XML Development and Developer Web Hosting
--
See you at XTech in San Diego.
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/view/e_spkr/790
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2001 11:30:40 UTC