- From: Jing Wu <jing@research.canon.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:48:13 +1100
- To: Michael Anderson <michael@research.canon.com.au>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Hi all, http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#derivation-by-list says A list datatype must be derived from an atomic or a list datatype, known as the itemType of the list datatype. It is inconsistent with followings. Jing Michael Anderson wrote: > Hi all, > I was wondering if a simple type can be a list of a simple type that has > a variety of union. The specifications seem inconsistent. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#cos-st-restricts says > If the variety is list: > 2.1 The item type definition must have a variety of atomic or union .... > > while http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#atomic-vs-list says > [ Definition:] List datatypes are those having values each of which > consists of a finite-length sequence of values of an atomic datatype. > > cheers, > mick. > > ps. The [ Definition: ] has a typo - "which" is written twice.
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2001 22:48:21 UTC