- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 26 Jan 2001 12:23:57 +0000
- To: "Martin Bryan" <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Martin Bryan" <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com> writes:
> I'm having trouble making substitution groups work. In the specification the
> example given of a substitution group has
>
> <xs:element name="facet" type="xs:facet" abstract="true"/>
>
> <xs:element name="encoding" substitutionGroup="xs:facet">
>
> where facet has been defined using <xs:complexType name="facet">
>
> I'm trying to work out what the significance of the addition of the xs:
> namespace to the type definition for the abstract element and for the
> substitutionGroup attribute.
All references to definitions and declarations in XML Schema are via
qualified names (QNames). Since 'facet' is a name in the XML Schema
namespace (which names both a (complex) type and an element),
references to it must be qualified with that namespace.
> Could this be something to do with the reason
> that if I try to import a file containing just the complexType and abstract
> element definitions into a schema that is designed to instatiate the
> abstract instances I start getting error messages from XML Spy?
Could be, I suppose. Sample files would help diagnose the problem.
The following is a sketch of what I take it you have in mind
core.xsd:
<xs:schema targetNamespace="http://www.example.com/core"
xmlns:c="http://www.example.com/core"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema">
<xs:complexType name="t1">
. . .
</xs:complexType>
<xs:element name="ce1" abstract="true" type="c:t1"/>
. . .
</xs:schema>
example.xsd:
<xs:schema targetNamespace="http://www.example.com/local"
xmlns:l="http://www.example.com/local"
xmlns:c="http://www.example.com/core"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema">
<xs:import namespace="http://www.example.com/core"
schemaLocation="core.xsd"/>
<xs:complexType name="l1">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="c:t1">
. . .
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:element name="le1" type="l:l1" substitutionGroup="c:ce1"/>
. . .
</xs:schema>
> What is the relationship of the name space of an abstract element or
> complexType definition to the targetNamespace and the null namespace
> (xmlns=...) properties of the containing schemas?
I hope the above example clarifies this. Declarations and definitions
in a schema document _always_ declare/define things with names in the
targetNamespace of the <schema> document element which contains them.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Friday, 26 January 2001 07:24:00 UTC