- From: Michael Anderson <michael@research.canon.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:46:21 +1100
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: "xmlschema-dev@w3.org" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Henry S. Thompson" wrote: <snip> > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#coss-ct > -- > Sorry, I must admit I'm having trouble finding the relevant section. Is it clause 1.1.5 (with the Note)? Is it saying that if you re-order your ancestors in any order then the complexType still needs to be a valid extension of its new base type??? This would plug the loophole of extending a restriction of a type with final = extension,.... but I don't think that is what 1.1.5 is saying. mick.
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2001 05:46:25 UTC