- From: Mathieu Mangeot Lerebours <Mathieu.Mangeot@imag.fr>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:33:59 +0200
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
- Message-Id: <p04330102b6fb6bc2e24c@[129.88.32.195]>
<import> works fine, my problem is solved. Thank you. > Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> writes: > >You need to <import> a schema for the xlink namespace. There is no >public schema yet for this namespace, but you can easily define a >trivial one. > BTW: in the examples given in the Primer xmlschema-0, it is not obvious that we have to indicate the schemaLocation ! I have 2 more questions: 1) xml header can't be used in schemas: bug or feature ? I thought that an XML schema was an XML document. So I wrote on top of my XML schemas the usual XML header: <?xml version='1.0' ?> But xsv fails to include the schema. Is it a bug or a feature of xsv ? 2) namespaces and schema location. Is it possible to write a schema by default for a corresponding namespace and avoiding to write explicitely the schema location ? I have my namespace: http://www-clips.imag.fr/geta/services/dml For the moment, I always have to indicate the schema location: <include namespace="http://www-clips.imag.fr/geta/services/dml" schemaLocation="dml.xsd" /> I would like to write a complete schema for this namespace and to let the schema validator fetching it without indicating the schema location. <include namespace="http://www-clips.imag.fr/geta/services/dml"/> Do I have to name my schema file "dml" or "dml.xsd" or is there another way to indicate the validators to take by default this file dml.xsd for the corresponding namespace: http://www-clips.imag.fr/geta/services/dml ? Thank you very much for your answers Mathieu -- Mathieu MANGEOT-LEREBOURS | Phone : +33 4 76 51 43 80 GETA-CLIPS-IMAG BP 53 | Fax : +33 4 76 51 44 05 F-38041 Grenoble cedex 9 | E-mail: Mathieu.Mangeot@imag.fr http://www-clips.imag.fr/geta/mathieu.mangeot
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2001 11:34:06 UTC