- From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@idoox.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:51:02 +0200
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Hello, I am a member of the crying mob complaining about the complexity of XML Schema Spec and as I do not want to be only a critique (it is an easy task to be one :) ), I have started a new Zvon project: XML Schema reference, I have published a preview on: http://zvon.org/Temp/Output/index.html. I am trying to translate the spec to a language someone with Ph.D. in technical sciences can understand and demonstrate its use on examples (in this preview there are e.g. for <xsd:element> ) I am afraid that this task is really stretching my capabilities to the limit, I could write a reference to XSLT from the spec, I even managed to write a RDF tutorial according to the spec (and it was really difficult to grasp), but with the XML Schema I just cannot understand many bits so forgive my frequent posting I expect to send, but I guess that such a reference will be appreciated by mortals who want to take full use of XML Schema. And my first question (I sent it to xml-dev, but have not received any answer): facets maxExclusive, minExclusive, maxInclusive, minInclusive can be used on types like: ENTITY, ID, IDREF, QName, NOTATION, ... but they cannot be used on: string, NCName, uriReference, ... QName, which can have these facets, consist of namespace name (uriReference) and local part(NCName), both of them cannot have these facets, how does it fit together? How should be ID's ordered to apply these facets (again ID's are sets of NCNames, which cannot have these facets)? -- ****************************************** <firstName> Miloslav </firstName> <surname> Nic </surname> <mail> nicmila@idoox.com </mail> <support> http://www.zvon.org </support> <zvonMailingList> http://www.zvon.org/index.php?nav_id=4 </zvonMailingList>
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2000 03:51:03 UTC