- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 30 Nov 2000 13:05:31 +0000
- To: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org, aaron.m.cohen@intel.com
Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org> writes: > Is there a way to detect the issue described below as > "syntactic atrocity" by writing Schemas in a certain way ? > > This would mean that the Schema processor can find that an > attribute qualified with two different namespaces actually > has the same semantics, and thus shouldn't be used twice > on an element, i.e. any document that does this is invalid. [here are the examples from another message] > AFAIK, this is legal syntax for the SMIL 2.0 language schema: > <smil xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/SMIL20/Language"> > ... > <smil:video begin="10s" smil20:begin="20s" .../> > > </smil> > > And, BTW, so is this: > > <smil xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/SMIL20/Language" > xmlns:basic="http://www.w3.org/2000/SMIL20/BasicInlineTiming"> > ... > <smil:video begin="10s" smil20:begin="20s" basic:begin="30s".../> > > </smil> > > We don't have semantics defined for these syntactic atrocities. There is no way in XML Schema 1.0 to rule this out -- it's a particularly poignant example of the need for co-constraints, timetabled for the next version, not this one. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Thursday, 30 November 2000 08:05:41 UTC