- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 06 Dec 2000 23:04:16 +0000
- To: Michael Anderson <michael@research.canon.com.au>
- Cc: Michael Burns <Michael.Burns@sas.com>, "'Don Mullen'" <donmullen@tibco.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Michael Anderson <michael@research.canon.com.au> writes: > Michael Burns wrote: > > > Still does not work. Gee, I thought this was a simple request :*) > > > > - - - snip - - - > > Problems with the schema-validity of the target > > file:/C:/ModelCompilerTestPen/test/xmlout/Properties.xml:5:2: Invalid per src-resolve: can't find a type for wildcard-matching element {None}:Cat > > < snip > > > The <any> and <anyAttribute> wildcard just mean you can have any > globally declared element in the content model or any globally > declared attribute. That's at least slightly misleading, as you clarify at the end. Martin Gudgin's reply is relevant here: exactly what <any(Attribute)...> means has two parts: 1) what's allowed; 2) what happens next. Wrt (1), the 'namespace' attribute is the _only_ thing which matters. By default, it allows absolutely any element(attribute). Wrt (2), the 'processContents' attribute determines: * 'skip' means that's it, no further processing of any kind is required for the containing element to be fine; * 'lax' means _if_ types can be found for the elements(attributes) allowed by the 'namespace', they should be used to validate them; * 'strict' means that types _must_ be found for the elements(attributes) allowed by the 'namespace' and used to validate them. > So you still need to declare Cat, Dog etc globally. Only if you have (as you do by default) processContents='strict', and have not used xsi:type in the instance. > The processor is trying to resolve Cat etc and can't find it so > throws an error. This is actually because the default level of > validation is "strict" which means the processor is _required_ to > resolve Cat etc. To fix this to what you want, try set > processContents = "lax" or even "skip". ie Right. > ps. Can you reply email to me to tell me if this works as I am > currently trying to understand exactly what "lax" means myself. > cheers. It better, because what you say here is correct! ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2000 18:04:40 UTC