- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 06 Dec 2000 20:12:18 +0000
- To: Jasmin Wason <jlw98r@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Jasmin Wason <jlw98r@ecs.soton.ac.uk> writes:
> Is it alright to have a group element with no name in a Schema?
>
> E.g.
>
> <complexType name="data">
> <sequence>
> <element name="number" type="integer"/>
> <group minOccurs="0">
> <sequence>
> <element name="anotherNumber" type="integer"/>
> ...
> </group>
No. The <group> element is only for defining named model groups or
referencing them. Just put the min on the sequence:
<complexType name="data">
<sequence>
<element name="number" type="integer"/>
<sequence minOccurs="0">
<element name="anotherNumber" type="integer"/>
...
</sequence>
</complexType>
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2000 15:12:23 UTC