- From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 18:14:24 -0500
- To: Daniel Acton <dacton@itouch.co.za>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
You might find what you need in substitution groups [1] and [2]. You might find that by making a substitution group <waysOfGettingAround> that includes both <stroll> and <walk> (and perhaps others), that you can do what you want. Within limits, you can provide for a controlled relationship on the types of <stroll> and <walk>, but you need to be careful with the declaration of the type for <waysOfGettingAround> itself. See the references below for the details. Please do let us know if this mechanism meets your needs, as we are trying to judge the effectiveness of our design. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#SubsGroups [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#key-equivalenceClass ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Daniel Acton <dacton@itouch.co.za> Sent by: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org 12/02/00 01:56 PM To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org cc: (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/CAM/Lotus) Subject: Element names Hi. I am trying to make an xmlschema to vaalidate different instances of an xml document. Do I have to explicitly name the elements in the schema, or can I make an element be recognised by it's attributes. Here's a scenario: --First instance-- <Dog> <sleep time="10" energy="5joules"/> <walk time="10km" energy="10joules"/> ... </Dog> --Second instance-- <Cat> <sleep time="25" energy="14joules"/> <stroll distance="2km" energy="50joules"/> ... </Cat> --Schema-- <xsd:element name="sleep" type="activityType"/> <xsd:element name="walk" type="activityType"/> <xsd:complexType="activityType"> <xsd:attribute name="distance" type="xsd:string"/> <xsd:attribute name="energy" type="xsd:string"/> </xsd:complexType> The above schema, I assume, and once again am standing to correction, would validate the first instance, but not the second. I have tried something similar, and have received the following: > Element 'stroll' not expected Is there a way I can tell the schema to expect an element with those attributes, but not explicitly state the name? Thank you in advance Daniel
Received on Monday, 4 December 2000 18:22:32 UTC