- From: Don Mullen <don@extensibility.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 12:24:33 -0400
- To: "'Norman Walsh'" <ndw@nwalsh.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Why not something like this? Granted, in this case you end up with extra choice groups, which in DTD would be: <!ENTITY % obj.mix "(a|b|c)"> <!ENTITY % para.mix "(d|e|f)"> <!ELEMENT foo (%obj.mix;|%para.mix;)+> Not exactly the same as your example. <?xml version = "1.0"?> <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd = "http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema"> <xsd:element name = "foo"> <xsd:complexType content = "elementOnly"> <xsd:choice minOccurs = "1" maxOccurs = "unbounded"> <xsd:group ref = "obj.mix"/> <xsd:group ref = "para.mix"/> </xsd:choice> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element> <xsd:group name = "para.mix"> <xsd:choice> <xsd:element ref = "d"/> <xsd:element ref = "e"/> <xsd:element ref = "f"/> </xsd:choice> </xsd:group> <xsd:group name = "obj.mix"> <xsd:choice> <xsd:element ref = "a"/> <xsd:element ref = "b"/> <xsd:element ref = "c"/> </xsd:choice> </xsd:group> <xsd:element name = "a" type = "string"/> <xsd:element name = "b" type = "string"/> <xsd:element name = "c" type = "string"/> <xsd:element name = "d" type = "string"/> <xsd:element name = "e" type = "string"/> <xsd:element name = "f" type = "string"/> </xsd:schema> > -----Original Message----- > From: Norman Walsh [mailto:ndw@nwalsh.com] > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 9:53 AM > To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org > Subject: DTDs to Schema, what am I missing? > > > Consider the following common case in DTDs: > > <!ENTITY % obj.mix "a|b|c"> > <!ENTITY % para.mix "d|e|f"> > <!ELEMENT foo (%obj.mix;|%para.mix;)+> > > I can't think of a way to express this idiom in XML Schema that > retains obj.mix and para.mix as discrete "things" and combines them > as necessary. > > Am I missing something? > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Things work out best for > those who make > http://nwalsh.com/ | the best of the way things work out. >
Received on Friday, 18 August 2000 12:26:15 UTC