- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 17 Aug 2000 13:45:41 +0100
- To: Robin LaFontaine <robin@monsell.co.uk>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Robin LaFontaine <robin@monsell.co.uk> writes: > In the element named 'schema' in the definition of XML Schema, there > is a constraint: > > > <key name="attribute"> > <selector>attribute</selector> > <field>@name</field> > </key> > > which indicates that the 'name' attribute is a key for the element > called attribute. > > > Why is there not a corresponding constraint within the element named > 'complexType' (and indeed in attributeGroup) in order to constrain all > its attributes to have different names? According to XML 1.0 it is > surely the case that whenever we have multiple attributes in an > element definition, they can always be distinguished by their 'name' > (which is an attribute in XML schema). > > > Therefore I would have thought that there would be a simile constraint > as above within complexType (and attributeGroup). Good idea, thanks! ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Thursday, 17 August 2000 08:45:44 UTC