- From: <petsa@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:28:02 -0400
- To: "Bengul, Enis A CECOM SEC" <bengul@mail1.MONMOUTH.ARMY.MIL>
- cc: "'xmlschema-dev@w3.org'" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
XML Schema has a set of stable public drafts that are in the last call period for Candidate Recomendation. I suggest you use these. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/ http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/ http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ All the best, Ashok "Bengul, Enis A CECOM SEC" <bengul@mail1.MONMOUTH.ARMY.MIL>@w3.org on 04/20/2000 05:17:42 PM Sent by: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org To: "'xmlschema-dev@w3.org'" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> cc: Subject: Which Schema to use? I am starting to develop a schema for our application. Am at a loss as to which schema spec to use. The W3C standard is obviously not yet out (when will it be finalized?). Should I use Microsoft's (we develop in VB and C, hence I will be using their DOM implementation anyways) Schema, or what is provided at their Biztalk.org site (what is the difference between the two anyways, and if they are different, why did MS have to come up with two different schema sets?) or should I use a third party product like the few listed in this list, or should I go with DTD? Is there a robust schema spec that fully implements the current W3C standard as proposed and has a fully functional parser/validator? Tx for any suggestions. Enis Bengul
Received on Friday, 21 April 2000 11:28:45 UTC