- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.at>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:38:25 +0200
- To: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Cc: XMLP Comments <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Anish, all the changes are cool with me, additionally I'd like to note that the second example also has spaces around the rep:Data content and that should probably be removed as well. 8-) Best regards, Jacek On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 04:29, Anish Karmarkar wrote: > Jacek, > > You raised an issue (#480) [1] regarding the Representation header [2] > LC doc. The WG agreed to classify the issue as editorial and directed > the editors to address your comment. > > Details: > > >1) Section 2.1, Representation header is not required, but may be > >useful, when multiple references... > > The sentence in question in section 2.1 has been changed to read: > "The Representation header block is also useful when multiple > references to the same resource are required but duplication of the > resource is undesirable." > > >2) Section 2.1 should the space around base64 characters in the example > >be dropped? > > The space around the base64 characters has been removed. > > >3) Section 2.3.2: does reinsert have the [specified] prop w/value > >"true"? I believe not. > > Section 2.2.3 (and not 2.3.2) is _not_ changed. The [specified] property > value is indeed 'true'. This requires the attribute to be specified and > not defaulted. > > >4) 2.3.2 Example Example - the link to the example should probably be > >titled otherwise 8-) > > The sentence is question is now changed to: > "An example of this usage is shown in Example 1." > > Hope this resolution is satisfactory. > > -Anish > -- > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x480 > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-soap12-rep-20040608/ >
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2004 03:40:35 UTC